Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-24 19:31 EST ------- Can we ponder the bytecompiling at the install time before doing this? - Does someone wants to spam bugs when one imports a flavor of emacsen like emacs22, SXEmacs etc etc, and all elisp packages needs to be reworked then? It sounds like the unnecessary work to me. changing the package name to emacs-<elisp name> should be still valid idea though, I suspect that we don't need an extra work to add subpackages for a flavor of emacsen at all. Could someone explain me the significant reason why we have to provide the bytecompiled packages for each flavor of emacsen rather than bytecompiling at the install time? - We didn't just need to care of others when we didn't work the community together, because we didn't have any plans to ship other emacsen any more. but now, we have a chance to do it. current approach isn't comfortable to do it and it imposes a burden on all elisp maintainers. I'd propose this again. TIA, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
