Fedora Extras

Date Index

Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, (continued)
[Bug 181997] New: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
- [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler, bugzilla
[Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
- [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
- [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
- [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
- [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
- [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning, bugzilla
[Bug 181994] New: Review Request: doulos-fonts, bugzilla
- [Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts, bugzilla
- [Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts, bugzilla
[Bug 181993] New: Review Request: charis-fonts - Charis SIL fonts, bugzilla
- [Bug 181993] Review Request: charis-fonts - Charis SIL fonts, bugzilla
- [Bug 181993] Review Request: charis-fonts - Charis SIL fonts, bugzilla
- [Bug 181993] Review Request: charis-fonts - Charis SIL fonts, bugzilla
- [Bug 181993] Review Request: charis-fonts - Charis SIL fonts, bugzilla
[Bug 181979] New: Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
- [Bug 181979] Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
- [Bug 181979] Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
- [Bug 181979] Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
- [Bug 181979] Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
- [Bug 181979] Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
- [Bug 181979] Review Request: python-geoip - Python bindings for the GeoIP geographical lookup libraries, bugzilla
[Bug 181974] New: Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
- [Bug 181974] Review Request: mod_geoip - Apache module for GeoIP lookups, bugzilla
PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Orion Poplawski
- Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Michael Schwendt
  - Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Ivan Gyurdiev
- Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Rex Dieter
  - Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Rex Dieter
  - Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Ralf Corsepius
    - Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Ivan Gyurdiev
      - Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Ivan Gyurdiev
      - Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Orion Poplawski
    - Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts, Orion Poplawski
[Bug 177166] Review Request: perl-Compress-Bzip2 - Interface to Bzip2 compression library, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 177166] Review Request: perl-Compress-Bzip2 - Interface to Bzip2 compression library, bugzilla
Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting, Dan Williams
  - buildsys and kernel modules (was: Re: Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting), Ville Skyttä
    - Re: buildsys and kernel modules (was: Re: Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting), Ville Skyttä
  - Re: Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting, Thorsten Leemhuis
    - Re: Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting, Dan Williams
      - Re: Summary from yesterdays fesco meeting, Thorsten Leemhuis
Bittorrent license, Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Bittorrent license, seth vidal
  - Re: Bittorrent license, Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Bittorrent license, Roozbeh Pournader
mock/yum/buildsys problems, Orion Poplawski
static libs ... again, Quentin Spencer
- Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
  - Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
  - Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
    - Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
      - Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
- Re: static libs ... again, Konstantin Ryabitsev
  - Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
    - Re: static libs ... again, Denis Leroy
- Re: static libs ... again, Linus Walleij
  - Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
    - Re: static libs ... again, Jeff Spaleta
      - Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Callum Lerwick
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
    - Re: static libs ... again, Warren Togami
      - Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
  - Re: static libs ... again, Ed Hill
    - Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
      - Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Orion Poplawski
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Linus Walleij
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: static libs ... again, Toshio Kuratomi
    - Re: static libs ... again, Patrice Dumas
    - Re: static libs ... again, Paul Howarth
[Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager, bugzilla
Snort, Dennis Gilmore
- Re: Snort, Michael J Knox
  - Re: Snort, Dennis Gilmore
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-02-17, Michael Schwendt
[ANN] Fedora Project Wiki Policy Change, Patrick Barnes
- [ANN] Fedora Project Wiki Policy Change (Update), Patrick Barnes
[Bug 181831] New: Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool, bugzilla
- [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool, bugzilla
- [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool, bugzilla
- [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool, bugzilla
- [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool, bugzilla
- [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool, bugzilla
goffice upgrade notice, Hans de Goede
Help/advice with new goffice with soname change, Hans de Goede
- Re: Help/advice with new goffice with soname change, Jeff Spaleta
  - Re: Help/advice with new goffice with soname change, Bill Nottingham
[Bug 181824] New: Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
- [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08, bugzilla
OTRS Review for Fedora Infrastructure, Mike McGrath
[Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
- [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server, bugzilla
[Bug 181803] New: Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
- [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
- [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
- [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
- [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
- [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
- [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub, bugzilla
GNU Smalltalk review needs assistance, Michel Salim
[Bug 181801] New: Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
- [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector, bugzilla
Requiring a versioned R in rpy, Jose' Matos
- Re: Requiring a versioned R in rpy, John Mahowald
Hammer3 seems to hang ?, Eric Tanguy
- Re: Hammer3 seems to hang ?, Dan Williams
FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Christian . Iseli
- Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis
  - Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Michael Schwendt
    - Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis
      - Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Michael Schwendt
        
        Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Michael Schwendt
        
        Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Ville Skyttä
        
        Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Josh Boyer
        
        tla (was: Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006), Ville Skyttä
        
        Re: tla (was: Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006), Josh Boyer
        
        Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Rex Dieter
        
        Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Nicolas Mailhot
  - Re: FE Package Status of Feb 16, 2006, Christian . Iseli
[Bug 181777] New: Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio (FITS File Subroutine Library), bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio, bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio, bugzilla
- [Bug 181777] Review Request: CCfits A C++ interface for cfitsio, bugzilla
Kernel debugging, vijaya.krishnan
Naming of font packages, Frank Arnold
- Re: Naming of font packages, Ralf Ertzinger
- Re: Naming of font packages, Nicolas Mailhot
[Bug 181753] New: Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181753] Review Request: mm - Shared memory allocation library, bugzilla
[Bug 177270] Review Request: libresample - A real-time library for audio sampling rate conversion, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 177270] Review Request: libresample - A real-time library for audio sampling rate conversion, bugzilla
- [Bug 177270] Review Request: libresample - A real-time library for audio sampling rate conversion, bugzilla
- [Bug 177270] Review Request: libresample - A real-time library for audio sampling rate conversion, bugzilla
- [Bug 177270] Review Request: libresample - A real-time library for audio sampling rate conversion, bugzilla
- [Bug 177270] Review Request: libresample - A real-time library for audio sampling rate conversion, bugzilla
Packaging review guidelines clarification, Ed Hill
- Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Mike McGrath
  - Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Michael Thomas
  - Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Paul Howarth
    - Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Mike McGrath
      - Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Paul Howarth
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Paul Howarth
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Ed Hill
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Rahul Sundaram
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Mike McGrath
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Josh Boyer
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Nicolas Mailhot
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Josh Boyer
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Dan Williams
        
        Do we want extras/testing/{4,5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4,5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Nicolas Mailhot
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4,5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Dan Williams
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Do we want extras/testing/{4, 5} repos (was Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification), Nicolas Mailhot
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Josh Boyer
        
        Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification, Ed Hill
[Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
- [Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats, bugzilla
Package with no "upstream" source - clamav-exim, Orion Poplawski
- Re: Package with no "upstream" source - clamav-exim, Jochen Schmitt
REMINDER: Review Day is today!, Kevin Fenzi
shared versus static for numerical and plotting, Patrice Dumas
- Re: shared versus static for numerical and plotting, Ralf Corsepius
  - Re: shared versus static for numerical and plotting, Patrice Dumas
[Fwd: Build Error (Job 4431): glpk-4_9-2_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Quentin Spencer
- Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 4431): glpk-4_9-2_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Dan Horák
Adopting package lincvs, Jochen Schmitt
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-02-15, Michael Schwendt
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-02-15, Michael Schwendt
Re: rpms/gcfilms/devel gcfilms.spec,1.7,1.8, Paul Howarth
- Problems during a PPC build (Was Re: rpms/gcfilms/devel gcfilms.spec,1.7,1.8), Christian Jodar
  - Re: Problems during a PPC build (Was Re: rpms/gcfilms/devel gcfilms.spec,1.7,1.8), Michael Schwendt
Package heartbeat needs a reviewer, Joost Soeterbroek
- Re: Package heartbeat needs a reviewer, Mike McGrath
[Bug 181599] New: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
  - Re: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, Michael Weiner
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
- [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software, bugzilla
[Bug 181534] New: Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
- [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data, bugzilla
hammer1/2 not right, Orion Poplawski
packaging suggestions., Michael J Knox
- Re: packaging suggestions., Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
  - Re: packaging suggestions., John (J5) Palmieri
    - Re: packaging suggestions., Michael J Knox
- Re: packaging suggestions., Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: packaging suggestions., Stephen J. Smoogen
  - Re: packaging suggestions., seth vidal
    - Re: packaging suggestions., Stephen J. Smoogen
      - Re: packaging suggestions., Michael J Knox
        
        Re: packaging suggestions., seth vidal
        
        Re: packaging suggestions., Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: packaging suggestions., seth vidal
        
        Re: packaging suggestions., Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: packaging suggestions., Nicolas Mailhot
        
        Re: packaging suggestions., Ralf Corsepius
[Bug 181450] New: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim, bugzilla
- [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim, bugzilla
- [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim, bugzilla
- [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim, bugzilla
[Bug 181445] New: Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
- [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout, bugzilla
[Bug 181444] New: Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
- [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages, bugzilla
source file "already there" but "not found" ? Was: Prep Error (Job 3879)fetchlog-1_0-4_fc5 on fedora-development-extras, Paul Wouters
- Re: source file "already there" but "not found" ? Was: Prep Error (Job 3879)fetchlog-1_0-4_fc5 on fedora-development-extras, Michael Schwendt
  - Re: source file "already there" but "not found" ? Was: Prep Error (Job 3879)fetchlog-1_0-4_fc5 on fedora-development-extras, Paul Wouters
    - Re: source file "already there" but "not found" ? Was: Prep Error (Job 3879)fetchlog-1_0-4_fc5 on fedora-development-extras, Michael Schwendt
[Fwd: Build Error (Job 4112): libstatgrab-0_12-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Oliver Falk
- Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 4112): libstatgrab-0_12-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Steven Pritchard
  - Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 4112): libstatgrab-0_12-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Oliver Falk
    - Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 4112): libstatgrab-0_12-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Orion Poplawski
buildsys borked, Orion Poplawski
- Re: buildsys borked, Orion Poplawski
[Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module, bugzilla
- [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module, bugzilla
- [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module, bugzilla
- [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module, bugzilla
[Bug 181404] New: Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
  - Re: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, Michael A. Peters
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse, bugzilla
Finding file conflicts, Orion Poplawski
- Re: Finding file conflicts, Michael Schwendt
What to do with generic man3 entries, Orion Poplawski
Seting of FE-REVIEW for reviewing packages, Jochen Schmitt
[Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony, bugzilla
- [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony, bugzilla
- [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony, bugzilla
- [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony, bugzilla
- [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony, bugzilla
[Bug 181369] New: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
- [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library, bugzilla
unorphaning packages, Patrice Dumas
- Re: unorphaning packages, Rahul Sundaram
Fedora Extras Review day #1 2006-02-15, Kevin Fenzi
Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Roozbeh Pournader
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Rahul Sundaram
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Nicolas Mailhot
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Dan Williams
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Michael Schwendt
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Rahul Sundaram
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Tim Jackson
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Ertzinger
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Toshio Kuratomi
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Michael Schwendt
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Ertzinger
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Nicolas Mailhot
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Michael Schwendt
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Panu Matilainen
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Panu Matilainen
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Bill Nottingham
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ville Skyttä
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Panu Matilainen
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ville Skyttä
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Panu Matilainen
- plague-client requeue <jobid> (Was: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of FedoraExtras, Jose Pedro Oliveira
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Hans de Goede
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Zoltan Kota
      - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Axel Liljencrantz
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Andreas Bierfert
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Jeremy Katz
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Zoltan Kota
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Hans de Goede
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Ville Skyttä
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Patrice Dumas
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Andreas Bierfert
    - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
  - Message not available
    - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
      - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Jose' Matos
        
        Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
      - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Rex Dieter
        
        Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
  - Message not available
    - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Matthew Miller
      - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Matthew Miller
        
        Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Matthew Miller
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Josh Boyer
  - Message not available
    - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Quentin Spencer
      - Re: Packages in CVS with no entry in the owners.list (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
  - Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
    - Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
      - Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Josh Boyer
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Josh Boyer
      - Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Andreas Thienemann
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Patrice Dumas
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Rahul Sundaram
      - Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Aurelien Bompard
        
        frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Brandon Holbrook
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Florin Andrei
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Hans de Goede
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Ville Skyttä
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), seth vidal
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: frustrated newcomers AND orphaned packages (Was: Rebuild status of FE5), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Hans de Goede
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Michael Schwendt
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Jeff Spaleta
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5, Brian Pepple
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Michael Schwendt
      - Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Michael Schwendt
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Ralf Corsepius
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Wart
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Michael Thomas
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras), Wart
      - Re: Rebuild status of FE5, Enrico Scholz
        
        Re: Rebuild status of FE5, Thorsten Leemhuis
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-02-13, Michael Schwendt
[Bug 173522] Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 173522] Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based, bugzilla
- [Bug 173522] Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based, bugzilla
FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, jfontain
- Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, Michael Schwendt
  - Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, jfontain
    - Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, Michael Schwendt
      - Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, jfontain
        
        Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, Michael Thomas
        
        Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, jfontain
        
        Re: FC4: %fedora_useradd undefined from rpm install, Enrico Scholz
gstreamer08 is dead; long live gstreamer, Christopher Aillon
- Re: gstreamer08 is dead; long live gstreamer, Aurelien Bompard
- Re: gstreamer08 is dead; long live gstreamer, Thomas Vander Stichele
  - Re: gstreamer08 is dead; long live gstreamer, Brian Pepple
  - Re: gstreamer08 is dead; long live gstreamer, Jeff Spaleta
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development, Jens Petersen
[Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk, bugzilla
- [Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk, bugzilla
- [Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk, bugzilla
[Bug 181068] New: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
- [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions, bugzilla
[Bug 168905] Review Request: python-nltk, bugzilla
[Bug 166207] Review Request: rekall : A KDE database front-end application, bugzilla
[Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
- [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client, bugzilla
[Bug 181035] New: Review Request: luks-tools, bugzilla
- [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools, bugzilla
- [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools, bugzilla
[Bug 181013] New: Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
- [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
- [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
- [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
- [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
- [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
- [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories, bugzilla
[Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla
- [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program, bugzilla

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Fedora Announce] [Red Hat Sound] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Install] [Linux Kernel]