Le jeudi 16 février 2006 à 09:30 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > On 2/16/06, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The problem with that is that not every reviewer has the bandwidth to > >> support a mock build environment (particularly for development), so it's > >> probably left as a "should", but a failure being a blocker. > > > > there was a discussion at somepoint about scratch build trees in the > > buildsystem to help with update builds. > > > > Would it be a worthwhile to extend that discussion about the value of > > enhancing the build system to have scratch areas so reviewers could > > submit srpms that aren't in cvs yet to spin up rpms using the > > dedicated buildsystem hardware without having to pull the build > > environment down locally? > > > > I have no idea how much work that would entail.. but its thing I think > > which would most greatly impact the quality of the review process for > > binaries. Not having access to all build arches and not having the > > bandwidth to pull down the development tree are large obstacles to > > doing quality review builds, at least for me. > > +1 +1 -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
