Re: Packaging review guidelines clarification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:34 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> The point could be made that mock should remain a should because if it
> does fail, its not getting in FE anyway until its fixed.
>
> //devils advocate.
Not quite - The question would be: Why does mock fail?

If it's because a BR: is missing then it wouldn't be a biggy, but if
it's because a package is missing or has changed in FC or FE, then the
review process has failed.

Ralf



-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux