> > Hi folks, > > I'm reviewing a package that builds on FC4 but not on devel due to > recent GCC issues. According to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > > "MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into > binary rpms on at least one supported architecture." > > but, unfortunately, this says nothing about *which* version(s) of FC > should be used. I think "one supported architecture on either > FC-current or FC-devel" would be appropriate but thats just my opinion. > And I could appreciate the reasoning behind "must build on FC-devel" > since its where all FE packages are initially imported. So would > someone (Spot?) please clarify? > > Ed > I've always used "a current supported version of Fedora Core" as a rule of thumb. I also treat the should build on mock as a must build on mock unless the contributor can provide a good reason as to why it won't build on mock. -Mike -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
