Re: static libs ... again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hans de Goede wrote:

But sometimes upstream doesn't, because they dont care about this for example, yet it would still be worth the trouble.

At the packagers discretion, sure, if they're willing to do the extra work, testing, troubleshooting.

I believe this needs more discussion we all seem to agree that static libs should be provided if possible,

???
There have been quite a few dissenters... including my own stance: static libs should in general be omitted, but allowing for exceptions(*)

(*) If there is good reason otherwise, and packager is willing.


-- Rex

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux