Ed Hill wrote:
Is there is a middle ground in this static libs discussion?
For instance, are there technical solutions such as:
- all static libs should or perhaps must be in a -static
sub-package
IMO, no point. If a packager really wants them, put 'em in -devel.
- no -static sub-packages are allowed as BuildRequires for
other FC or FE packages
In general, agreed.
- the -static packages are strictly optional so maintainers
may provide them or not at their own discretion
I'd argue the general rule should be that static libs be omitted, unless
there is (very) good reason to include otherwise.
-- Rex
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
