Le samedi 18 février 2006 à 17:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt a écrit : > On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:25:24 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > The one thing *I* promised to do > > > (and have done several days ago) is to purge broken binary orphans from > > > the repo. I did not suggest removing any other orphans from the repo. That > > > would break post-install yum upgrades: libs upgraded, exe upgrades not > > > available => transaction check => *boom* > > > > Well, we need to deal with that somehow. For example a "Rebuild the > > orphan packages task force" -- but who will do that? And who will > > maintain them later during lifetime of FE6? And how long are we going to > > do that? Forever? I don't think that will work. > > No, but this time we announce them on the FC5Status page as officially > orphaned, remove them from devel after FC-5 branch is available, and then > move on. Remember, we've used those FCXStatus pages like that before. Well, as long as they rebuild as-is and no one complains of the result, why not let them in FE ? It's not black-and-white, we should take into account the level of maintenance needed on a package-per-package basis. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
