Hi folks, I produced a new package status, and tried to fix the reported bugs. Summary is in a separate mail. fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said: > Quite long now. That's a bit problematic afaics. I really would like to have > the important stuff more highlighted. I agree, and welcome any propositions :-) > For example, the stuff that really needs fixing (or at least needs a > explanation why it's broken) should also be sent to the list IMHO. Or maybe > directly to the E-Mail addresses listed. Maybe both. I mean the following > sections: Ok, tried to add those in the email. > There are some other sections like > - "Packages that have not yet completed review", > - "Potential problems: > 'We have X accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the > package in the development repo' > and > 'We have 8 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the > package in the owners file'" > - "Some cleanup needed" > - ...and maybe some other sections, too > > Those should be trivial to fix for the owners. They just needed to be > poked by someone -- in an ideal world the script would do that directly. > Christian, would that be possible? I guess anything's possible :-) I didn't see a big discussion about people wanting to be poked by email, so before I go and make a nuisance of myself, I'd like to be reasonably confident that it's a Good Thing(tm) I also added a new section about maintainers, trying to highlight which one might need a hand in fixing a large number of open bug reports, and those that have not touched CVS in a long while, maybe indicating that they have "disappeared" and their packages become orphaned... Cheers, Christian -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
