On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:00:09 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > - "Packages missing in owners.list" -- I send a mail out on that ropic > an hour ago. If all owners react we should get rid of those soon. owners.list is "Step 9" of the NewPackageProcess! It is inacceptable that during package review the bugzilla ticket is CLOSED before an entry to owners.list has been added. I've had no luck contacting the owner of "at-poke" by mail and neither via maintainers-list. So this issue is one that "sucks very much" IMO. > - "Orphaned packages present in the development repo" -- They normally > should be removed IMHO. Might be a bit to late for FE5, but I still > think we have enough time (BTW, why are they still there? We agreed in > one of the past FESCo meeting that they should be removed *before* the > mass rebuild) Did we? Then that was a misunderstanding. The one thing *I* promised to do (and have done several days ago) is to purge broken binary orphans from the repo. I did not suggest removing any other orphans from the repo. That would break post-install yum upgrades: libs upgraded, exe upgrades not available => transaction check => *boom* Further, there are some packages marked as orphans, which are not really orphans. And some have been added to Extras through the new package process and appear as orphaned nevertheless, e.g. "hula"? Uh? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
