On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Okay, let's look at the whole situation from a different perspective. > The following list shows maintainers that still have to rebuild more > than 5 packages: > 5 nos_AT_utelsystems.com Nils has not signed up since the transition from fedora.us to Fedora Extras. > bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net abicheck 1.2-9 This is a noarch package in disguise, a Perl script. Its build-time tests have given mixed results on different archs several times before. Hence I prefer building it platform-dependent. > bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net aide 0.10-2 > Due to upstream changes in libmhash I've delayed updates here as long as possible. Trouble with flex on x86_64 (bug #183098) still needs further investigation. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
