Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:22 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Okay, let's look at the whole situation from a different perspective. > > The following list shows maintainers that still have to rebuild more > > than 5 packages: > > 5 nos_AT_utelsystems.com > Nils has not signed up since the transition from fedora.us to Fedora > Extras. Okay, so they are practically orphaned for at least a year? Wow. So let's orphan them for real. Anyone interested in on of the following packages? dillo, gktools, gtkterm, neverball, whowatch > > bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net abicheck 1.2-9 > This is a noarch package in disguise, a Perl script. Its build-time tests > have given mixed results on different archs several times before. Hence I > prefer building it platform-dependent. > > bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net aide 0.10-2 > Due to upstream changes in libmhash I've delayed updates here as long as > possible. Trouble with flex on x86_64 (bug #183098) still needs further > investigation. Added this informations to where we track it now: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FC5Status CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
