Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 22:20 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede: > > Patrice Dumas wrote: > >> interest in fedora-extras? Or do they route mail from fedora-maintainers > >> to /dev/null? Or did they unsubscribe from the list (iirc it is > >> mandatory to be subscribed to fedora-maintainers if you maintain a > >> package in extras. Or am I wrong here?). > > > > I haven't seen such a thing. It isn't even advertised in the wiki (if my > > search in the wiki isn't wrong). I personaly think that fedora-extras-list > > and fedora-maintainers should be merged (and bugzilla reviews should go to > > another list to keep traffic on fedora-extras-list low). But I guess this > > has allready been talked about previously... (and I'm gonna subscribe to > > fedora-maintainers). > + a zillion I disagree ;-) > I almost never (never say never) read the bugzilla generated mails, and > I get confused about what to send to maintainers and what to send to > extras-list. Read the FESCo-Meeting summary from the last meeting: ---- * separate extras-ml-list for bugzilla spam * We'll probably open fedora-extras-bugzilla-list and fedora-extras-review-list. All contributors should subscribe to -reviews. ---- fedora-extras-review-list -> review bugs fedora-extras-bugzilla-list -> everything else related to Extras fedora-extras-list should remain for general discussions about Fedora Extras. fedora-maintainers should stay for all maintainers (redhat and community) that only want to maintain stuff, but don't what to be involved with all the flamewars ^w discussions on fedora-extras-list. Patrice, Hans, that okay for you? CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
