On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 09:45 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 09:11 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 01:13 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 18:42 +1300, Michael J Knox wrote: > > > > Stephen J. Smoogen said: > > > > > On 2/14/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Could /opt/bro be a possability? > > > > > > > > I have started the trek of patching up bro to be a little more FHS > > > > friendly, but no idea as to when I will be finished. > > > > > > > > > > /opt is discouraged for package-managed software. > > Correction: for OS-vendor supplied packages. > > > > There isn't anything wrong in using /opt rsp. /opt/<package> for > > package-vendor supplied packages. > > > > okay -but surely we count as os-vendor not package-vendor, right? Yep, at least that's how all FE packages currently are being packaged. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
