On 2/14/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Looking at this old patched version. I had to make some changes to Bro > > that I sent upstream, and could not use the %configure but had to add > > some entries to make it do what it should and not what it wanted. > > > > If the /svr/bro tree is allowed in extras.. that would clean up most > > of the problems. Bro is a server/service. If it isnt.. expect to do a > > bunch of cleanup. I think that most of my patch doesnt work with the > > later versions due to offsets and such. > > > Talked to Seth on IRC, and /srv is also not the correct place for it either from the FHS.. The bro package is going to need a lot of little patches to match the FHS I think. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list