Stephen J. Smoogen said: > On 2/14/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Looking at this old patched version. I had to make some changes to Bro >> > that I sent upstream, and could not use the %configure but had to add >> > some entries to make it do what it should and not what it wanted. >> > >> > If the /svr/bro tree is allowed in extras.. that would clean up most >> > of the problems. Bro is a server/service. If it isnt.. expect to do a >> > bunch of cleanup. I think that most of my patch doesnt work with the >> > later versions due to offsets and such. >> > >> > > Talked to Seth on IRC, and /srv is also not the correct place for it > either from the FHS.. The bro package is going to need a lot of little > patches to match the FHS I think. > > Could /opt/bro be a possability? I have started the trek of patching up bro to be a little more FHS friendly, but no idea as to when I will be finished. Michael. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
