Fedora Extras

• Date Index

• [Bug 183043] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Revisions, (continued)
  • [Bug 183043] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Revisions, bugzilla
• [Bug 183042] New: Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183042] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183042] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183042] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183042] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs, bugzilla
• [Bug 183041] New: Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183041] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183041] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183041] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183041] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183041] Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl, bugzilla
• [Bug 183040] New: Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki, bugzilla
• [Bug 183039] New: Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183039] Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183039] Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183039] Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183039] Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183039] Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183039] Review Request: perl-Spoon, bugzilla
• [Bug 183038] New: Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183038] Review Request: perl-IO-All, bugzilla
• [Bug 183028] New: Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
  • [Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy, bugzilla
• Summary from last FESCo meeting, Thorsten Leemhuis
  • Frustrated package submitters? (was: Re: Summary from last FESCo meeting), Michael Schwendt
    • Re: Frustrated package submitters? (was: Re: Summary from last FESCo meeting), Ed Hill
      • Re: Frustrated package submitters? (was: Re: Summary from last FESCo meeting), Patrice Dumas
        • Re: Frustrated package submitters?, Hans de Goede
    • Re: Frustrated package submitters?, Jason L Tibbitts III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Summary from last FESCo Meeting, Thorsten Leemhuis
• maxima bug?, leon
  • Re: maxima bug?, Jason L Tibbitts III
  • Re: maxima bug?, Rex Dieter
• PPC (game) testing help needed, Hans de Goede
  • Re: PPC (game) testing help needed, Frank Arnold
• Help with python-matplotlib packaging, Orion Poplawski
  • Re: Help with python-matplotlib packaging, Jose' Matos
• [Bug 182966] New: Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus-2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm, bugzilla
• [Bug 182941] New: Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner, bugzilla
• please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Gabriel L. Somlo
  • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Ville Skyttä
    • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Gabriel L. Somlo
      • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Paul Howarth
      • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Ralf Ertzinger
  • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Jason L Tibbitts III
  • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Jason L Tibbitts III
  • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Ralf Ertzinger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Gabriel L. Somlo
    • Re: please help: %doc causing extra dependencies ?, Jason L Tibbitts III
• [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2, bugzilla
• [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter, bugzilla
• [Bug 182744] New: Review Request: libnasl - Nessus Attack Scripting Language, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182744] Review Request: libnasl - Nessus Attack Scripting Language, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182744] Review Request: libnasl - Nessus Attack Scripting Language, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182744] Review Request: libnasl - Nessus Attack Scripting Language, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182744] Review Request: libnasl - Nessus Attack Scripting Language, bugzilla
• [Bug 182743] New: Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries, bugzilla
• [Bug 182737] New: Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys, bugzilla
• Re: rpms/scorched3d/FC-4 scorched3d-apoc-3.1-bins.tgz, NONE, 1.1 scorched3d-apoc-3.1.patch, NONE, 1.1 scorched3d.spec, 1.6, 1.7, Enrico Scholz
• requires for lcov, Dan Horák
  • Re: requires for lcov, Paul Howarth
  • Re: requires for lcov, Ralf Corsepius
    • Re: requires for lcov, Roland McGrath
      • Re: requires for lcov, Dan Horák
• Rebuilding during make install process, Paul
  • Re: Rebuilding during make install process, Patrice Dumas
    • Re: Rebuilding during make install process, Paul F. Johnson
  • Re: Rebuilding during make install process, Paul Howarth
• [Bug 182678] New: Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts, bugzilla
• More on anjuta2, Paul
  • Re: More on anjuta2, Chitlesh GOORAH
    • Re: More on anjuta2, Paul F. Johnson
  • Re: More on anjuta2, Ville Skyttä
  • Re: More on anjuta2, Paul Howarth
• [Fwd: Build Error (Job 5181): tong-1_0-6_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Michael Thomas
  • Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 5181): tong-1_0-6_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Dan Williams
    • Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 5181): tong-1_0-6_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 5181): tong-1_0-6_fc5 on fedora-development-extras], Michael Thomas
• Some comment to Extras/Schedule/SecurityPolicy, Jochen Schmitt
• Orphaning cvsup, Adrian Reber
  • Re: Orphaning cvsup, Ville Skyttä
• Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Jochen Schmitt
  • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Patrice Dumas
    • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
      • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
        • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
          • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
            • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
              • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
                  • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
              • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Miloslav Trmac
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
                  • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
                    • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
      • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Patrice Dumas
        • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
          • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Patrice Dumas
            • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
              • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
                  • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
                    • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
          • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Ralf Corsepius
            • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Enrico Scholz
              • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Ralf Corsepius
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
              • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Michael Schwendt
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Hans de Goede
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Ralf Corsepius
                • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Callum Lerwick
                  • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Michael Schwendt
                    • Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc, Callum Lerwick
• Re: rpms/libtorrent/FC-4 libtorrent.spec,1.3,1.4, Michael Schwendt
• Buildsys / FC4 weirdness, Chris Chabot
  • Re: Buildsys / FC4 weirdness, Mike McGrath
• Updating just a spec file to cvs, Paul
  • Re: Updating just a spec file to cvs, Michael Thomas
• webserver, apache user and cgi, Patrice Dumas
• Re: rpms/perl-Unicode-Map8/devel perl-Unicode-Map8.spec,1.7,1.8, Ville Skyttä
  • Re: rpms/perl-Unicode-Map8/devel perl-Unicode-Map8.spec,1.7,1.8, Aurelien Bompard
• [Bug 175473] Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels, bugzilla
• [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility, bugzilla
  • [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility, bugzilla
  • [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility, bugzilla
• [Bug 182463] New: Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo), bugzilla
• [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
  • [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons, bugzilla
• [Bug 174440] Review Request: bakery - C++ framework for creating GNOME apps, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 174440] Review Request: bakery - C++ framework for creating GNOME apps, bugzilla
  • [Bug 174440] Review Request: bakery - C++ framework for creating GNOME apps, bugzilla
  • [Bug 174440] Review Request: bakery - C++ framework for creating GNOME apps, bugzilla
  • [Bug 174440] Review Request: bakery - C++ framework for creating GNOME apps, bugzilla
  • [Bug 174440] Review Request: bakery - C++ framework for creating GNOME apps, bugzilla
• [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager, bugzilla
• FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Dan Williams
  • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, seth vidal
  • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Patrice Dumas
    • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Jeff Spaleta
      • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Jason L Tibbitts III
      • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Ville Skyttä
        • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Chris Weyl
        • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Jeff Spaleta
          • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Michael Schwendt
        • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Bill Nottingham
          • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Ville Skyttä
            • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Bill Nottingham
  • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Orion Poplawski
  • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Ralf Corsepius
    • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Ville Skyttä
      • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, seth vidal
        • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Paul Howarth
          • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, seth vidal
            • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Ralf Ertzinger
              • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, seth vidal
                • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Christian . Iseli
        • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, Ralf Corsepius
          • Re: FC-4 Extras buildsystem breakage details, seth vidal
• Orphaned: elmo, Aurelien Bompard
  • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Mike McGrath
    • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Aurelien Bompard
      • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Ville Skyttä
  • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Thorsten Leemhuis
    • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Aurelien Bompard
    • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Nicolas Mailhot
      • Re: Orphaned: elmo, Thorsten Leemhuis
• [Bug 165666] Review Request: Graph Visualization Tools, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 165666] Review Request: Graph Visualization Tools, bugzilla
• [Bug 182440] New: Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine, bugzilla
• Odd "Fedora Exrras" bugzilla product, Jason L Tibbitts III
• Orphaned kdetoys, Rex Dieter
  • Re: Orphaned kdetoys, Dennis Gilmore
    • Re: Orphaned kdetoys, Rex Dieter
  • Re: Orphaned kdetoys, Paul F. Johnson
• FE Package Status of Feb 22, 2006, Christian . Iseli
  • Re: FE Package Status of Feb 22, 2006, Paul F. Johnson
• [Bug 176021] Review Request: bwidget - extended widget set for Tcl/Tk, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 176021] Review Request: bwidget - extended widget set for Tcl/Tk, bugzilla
• [Bug 182415] New: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: manpages-uk-utf8 - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182415] Review Request: manpages-uk-utf8 - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
• [Bug 182413] New: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182413] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project, bugzilla
• [Bug 182411] New: Review Request: man-pages-uk, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182411] Review Request: man-pages-uk, bugzilla
• THE SKY IS FALLING - FC4 and i386 builds, Mike McGrath
  • Re: THE SKY IS FALLING - FC4 and i386 builds, Rex Dieter
• [Bug 174268] Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 174268] Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 174268] Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl, bugzilla
• [Bug 182330] New: Review Request: graphviz, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182330] Review Request: graphviz, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182330] Review Request: graphviz, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182330] Review Request: graphviz, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182330] Review Request: graphviz, bugzilla
• Build problems - any advice, Paul
  • Re: Build problems - any advice, Ralf Corsepius
    • Re: Build problems - any advice, Paul F. Johnson
      • Re: Build problems - any advice, Ralf Corsepius
        • Re: Build problems - any advice, Paul F. Johnson
          • Re: Build problems - any advice, Ralf Corsepius
            • Re: Build problems - any advice, Paul F. Johnson
• [Bug 182320] New: Review Request: gnome-build, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build, bugzilla
• [Bug 182319] New: Review Request: anjuta-gdl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl, bugzilla
• Abandonned packages - bonobo and gnome-vfs, Paul
  • Re: Abandonned packages - bonobo and gnome-vfs, Bill Nottingham
    • Re: Abandonned packages - bonobo and gnome-vfs, Paul F. Johnson
      • Re: Abandonned packages - bonobo and gnome-vfs, Bill Nottingham
• [Bug 182306] New: Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182306] Review Request: dogtail - GUI test tool and automation framework, bugzilla
• [Bug 182305] New: Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182305] Review Request: pyspi - Python bindings for AT-SPI, bugzilla
• Buildsys needs a kick, Aurelien Bompard
  • Re: Buildsys needs a kick, seth vidal
    • Re: Buildsys needs a kick, Aurelien Bompard
• FC4 builds are broken - please fix!, orion
  • Re: FC4 builds are broken - please fix!, Andreas Bierfert
    • Re: FC4 builds are broken - please fix!, Paul Howarth
• [Bug 182256] New: Review Request: Socks Server 5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182256] Review Request: Socks Server 5, bugzilla
• [Bug 182255] New: Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182255] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
• [Bug 182254] New: Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5, bugzilla
• [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
  • [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util: A C library for creating CGI programs, bugzilla
• Build failure for amarok, Aurelien Bompard
  • Re: Build failure for amarok, Michael Schwendt
    • Re: Build failure for amarok, Aurelien Bompard
• find_lang problem, Paul F. Johnson
  • Re: find_lang problem, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    • Re: find_lang problem, Paul F. Johnson
  • Re: find_lang problem, Michael Schwendt
• [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
  • [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog, bugzilla
• Is there an easier way to do this?, Paul
  • Re: Is there an easier way to do this?, Paul Howarth
• [Bug 177277] Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit : Portable LIMIT Emulation, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 177277] Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit : Portable LIMIT Emulation, bugzilla
  • [Bug 177277] Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit : Portable LIMIT Emulation, bugzilla
  • [Bug 177277] Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit : Portable LIMIT Emulation, bugzilla
  • [Bug 177277] Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit : Portable LIMIT Emulation, bugzilla
  • [Bug 177277] Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit : Portable LIMIT Emulation, bugzilla
• Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Jason L Tibbitts III
  • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Warren Togami
    • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Jason L Tibbitts III
      • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Ralf Corsepius
        • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Jason L Tibbitts III
          • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Ralf Corsepius
            • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Jason L Tibbitts III
              • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Ralf Corsepius
                • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Jason L Tibbitts III
                  • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Paul Howarth
    • Re: Specifying arch in BuildRequires:, Jason L Tibbitts III
• ctrlproxy - change of maintainer, Josh Boyer
• Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul
  • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
    • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
      • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
        • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
          • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
            • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
              • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
          • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
            • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
              • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
                • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
                  • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Michael Schwendt
                    • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
                      • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul Howarth
                        • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
                          • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul Howarth
                            • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
                              • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
                                • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
                      • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Michael Schwendt
                        • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Andy Shevchenko
                          • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Chitlesh GOORAH
                            • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Paul F. Johnson
                          • Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer, Michael Schwendt
                            • reviewing (was: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Andy Shevchenko
  • Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Michael J Knox
    • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul F. Johnson
      • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul Howarth
        • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul F. Johnson
          • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul F. Johnson
            • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul Howarth
              • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul F. Johnson
                • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul Howarth
                  • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul F. Johnson
                    • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul Howarth
                • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Thorsten Leemhuis
    • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Brian Pepple
      • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Michael J Knox
        • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Paul F. Johnson
          • Re: Changing maintainer in general (WAS Re: Anjuta - change of maintainer), Michael J Knox
• [Bug 182175] New: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
  • [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm), bugzilla
• [Bug 182173] New: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator, bugzilla
• ppc builder problem, Ville Skyttä
  • Re: ppc builder problem, seth vidal
    • Re: ppc builder problem, Ville Skyttä
      • Re: ppc builder problem, seth vidal
        • Re: ppc builder problem, Gijs Hollestelle
          • Re: ppc builder problem, Patrice Dumas
• [Bug 182122] New: Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
    • Re: [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, Christian . Iseli
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail, bugzilla
• deciphering a build failure, Roozbeh Pournader
  • Re: deciphering a build failure, Dan Williams
    • Re: deciphering a build failure, Roozbeh Pournader
  • Re: deciphering a build failure, Orion Poplawski
  • Re: deciphering a build failure, Orion Poplawski
    • Re: deciphering a build failure, Mike McGrath
      • Re: deciphering a build failure, Patrice Dumas
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-02-20, Michael Schwendt
• abiword desktop file has wrong mimetypes, leon
  • Re: abiword desktop file has wrong mimetypes, Rex Dieter
• [Bug 173692] Review Request: libnotify, bugzilla
• Crontab and init scripts, Mike McGrath
  • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Bill Nottingham
    • Re: Crontab and init scripts, seth vidal
    • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Bill Nottingham
    • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Jason L Tibbitts III
      • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Mike McGrath
        • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Mike McGrath
          • Re: Crontab and init scripts, seth vidal
            • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Mike McGrath
            • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Ville Skyttä
              • Re: Crontab and init scripts, seth vidal
          • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Ivan Gyurdiev
            • Re: Crontab and init scripts, Mike McGrath
• [Bug 182077] New: Review Request: cfv - utility to test and create checksums, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182077] Review Request: cfv - utility to test and create checksums, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182077] Review Request: cfv - utility to test and create checksums, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182077] Review Request: cfv - utility to test and create checksums, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182077] Review Request: cfv - utility to test and create checksums, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182077] Review Request: cfv - utility to test and create checksums, bugzilla
• [Bug 182064] New: Review Request: <main package name here>, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter, bugzilla
• [Bug 182040] New: Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182040] Review Request: ratpoison - simplified keyboard-only window manager, bugzilla
• [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
  • [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount, bugzilla
• [Bug 182027] New: Review Request: postgrey, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey, bugzilla
  • [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey, bugzilla
• %{SOURCEn} versus $RPM_SOURCE_DIR, Jason L Tibbitts III
  • Re: %{SOURCEn} versus $RPM_SOURCE_DIR, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    • Re: %{SOURCEn} versus $RPM_SOURCE_DIR, Jason L Tibbitts III
      • Re: %{SOURCEn} versus $RPM_SOURCE_DIR, Rex Dieter
• [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis, bugzilla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis, bugzilla
  • [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis, bugzilla
  • [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis, bugzilla
  • [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis, bugzilla
• Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
  • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Nicolas Mailhot
    • Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Warren Togami
      • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
      • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Nicolas Mailhot
        • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Bill Nottingham
        • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
          • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Warren Togami
            • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Thorsten Leemhuis
              • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Nicolas Mailhot
              • Re: Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras), Michael Schwendt
  • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Michael Schwendt
    • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Brian Pepple
    • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Thorsten Leemhuis
    • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Patrice Dumas
    • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Michael Schwendt
      • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Patrice Dumas
  • Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras, Dennis Gilmore