Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Enrico Scholz wrote:
mitr@xxxxxxxx (Miloslav Trmac) writes:
If ipsvd dynamically links to glibc, the ipsvd maintainer doesn't
have to watch for dietlibc changes;

ipvsd is designed for 'dietlibc' (malloc() and friends are the only
higher level functions, the other imported functions are pure syscall
wrappers). So would not need to take care about dietlibc changes
neither.


Please stop claiming this, using dietlibc is your idea, ipvsd upstream does not advice let alone propagandizes this.

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux