j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx (Hans de Goede) writes: >>> If ipsvd dynamically links to glibc, the ipsvd maintainer doesn't >>> have to watch for dietlibc changes; >> ipvsd is designed for 'dietlibc' (malloc() and friends are the only >> higher level functions, the other imported functions are pure syscall >> wrappers). So would not need to take care about dietlibc changes >> neither. > > Please stop claiming this, using dietlibc is your idea, ipvsd upstream > does not advice upstream mentions 'dietlibc' several times and praises low memory consumption. I would interpret this as 'advice'... Enrico PS: numbers will follow soon... -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
