Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175631 tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-09 19:16 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint checks return: E: fedora-package-config-smart no-binary W: fedora-package-config-smart no-documentation Both are safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK - spec file legible, in am. english - no real way to check config files against "upstream" - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - content ok - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. One down, one to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
