Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnasl - Nessus Attack Scripting Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182744 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-03-18 00:14 EST ------- A number of compile warnings due to integers and pointers. It'd be nice if upstream fixed them. Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: libpcap (by nessus-libraries-devel), tetex-dvips (by tetex-latex) Good: - rpmlint checks return: rpmlint of libnasl: W: libnasl non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/nessus/nessus_org.pem not really conf file, can ignore rpmlint of libnasl-devel: E: libnasl-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib symlink, can ignore - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
