Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2006, 02:42 -0500 schrieb Warren Togami: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > And then we have the same problem that Fedora Legacy currently has taken > > to Fedora Extras (Legacy) -- it works, but it has a bad (or "not the > > best") reputation because it sucked in the beginning. > > > > Do we want that? I would prefer a EOL call over a badly working Fedora > > Extras Legacy. > > > > I don't agree here. We should at least give the community a chance to > maintain the collection, and EOL or retirement only happens if the > community fails on a particular distribution. I have a feeling that FE3 > will continue to have users long after FE4 for various reasons for example. I fully agree that we should give the community a chance to maintain the collection. But earlier in this thread I got the impression "start a fedora extras legacy even if it is foreseeable that it will suck and fail" -- I don't like that idea to much. CU thl -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
