IMHO : 1. we should formally create an FE Legacy team. FEL would be composed of the Aurora/Centos/FCL/FE people that want to maintain old releases. Some poor sucker should be nominated to serve as initial fearless leader (surely of all the Aurora/Centos/FC3 users one is ready to take charge?) 2. the handover from FE to FEL should be synchronized with the one from FC to FCL. It's the only sane solution WRT users, they have other things to do than track multiple overlapping Fedora schedules (also from a marketing POW its probably saner to advertise to users the move at FCn+1 time, and let the FCn+1 -> FCn+2T2 be the grace period that was always intended) 3. we should let FEL define its own policies. Today we don't know the number of people interested in FEL and their level of involvement. It's useless to dictate rules to a team which is not assembled yet. People who want to do it should first go to 1. and create some form of entity 4. If in X months no one has stepped to 1. we should recognise the level of community support to create a FEL is not here yet, and announce loudly no one maintains FE3 anymore. Keep the repo for historical reasons but move it to a freezer so non one mistakenly use it on actual systems. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
