Le dimanche 19 février 2006 à 09:08 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit : > Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2006, 02:42 -0500 schrieb Warren Togami: > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > > > And then we have the same problem that Fedora Legacy currently has taken > > > to Fedora Extras (Legacy) -- it works, but it has a bad (or "not the > > > best") reputation because it sucked in the beginning. > > > > > > Do we want that? I would prefer a EOL call over a badly working Fedora > > > Extras Legacy. > > > > > > > I don't agree here. We should at least give the community a chance to > > maintain the collection, and EOL or retirement only happens if the > > community fails on a particular distribution. I have a feeling that FE3 > > will continue to have users long after FE4 for various reasons for example. > > I fully agree that we should give the community a chance to maintain the > collection. But earlier in this thread I got the impression "start a > fedora extras legacy even if it is foreseeable that it will suck and > fail" -- I don't like that idea to much. Well, you know even if we had the forethought to prepare this team months ago FEL3 would have sucked. It takes time for a new team to find its marks. We could mitigate this fact by announcing FEL3 is a beta or something like this. The real milestone if we get the ball rolling now is FEL4. Even Red Hat took a few releases to find a new working model after RHL 7.3 -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
