[Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182463


bugs.michael@xxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |bugs.michael@xxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx  2006-03-24 18:00 EST -------
Package is in quite good shape. Almost there. These minor issues
are left:

* missing "BuildRequires: pkgconfig"

* cairomm-devel should really "Requires: pkgconfig", because (1) it
contains a pkg-config file and (2) the library headers are stored in
a path that is unlikely to be found if pkg-config is not used

* prefer "make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install" over %makeinstall, since
while the former is de facto standard, the latter is just a hack

* AUTHORS %doc file is about libxmlplusplus and points to its home page

* README %doc file has libxml++ at the top, very confusing, both files
should really be corrected

* Also note that the cairomm-devel package contains more than "headers
and static library". ;)  The very important *.so symlink is included, too.

> E: cairomm shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libcairomm-1.0.so.0.0.5

Cannot reproduce this on i686, but if it occurs on x86_64, it must
be patched to compile everything with -fPIC. Also skim over the build
log and check whether you see the configure checks and whether -fPIC
is used during compilation:

| checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
| checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes

| checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC
| checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes


> W: cairomm unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libcairomm-1.0.so.0.0.5

Cannot reproduce. When you get this, most likely you either don't
have the redhat-rpm-config package installed or you've disabled
creation of debuginfo packages via ~/.rpmmacros: %debug_package %{nil}


As a hint at the bottom:

| %{_includedir}/cairomm-1.0/*
vs.
| %{_includedir}/cairomm-1.0

Even better to the eyes, since you see it's a directory (!):

%{_includedir}/cairomm-1.0/


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux