On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 10:52 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > RC> --with-newlib or --enable-multilib? > > Neither. Honestly, until today I didn't know those flags existed. > > The failed build is at > http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/gpc/x86_64-failed-build.log This clearly is a side-effect of FC's broken GCC packaging. FC's GCC had been configured w/ --enable-multilib, and the gcc driver (/usr/bin/gcc) knows about it. When building gpc, gcc/configure detects /usr/bin/gcc reporting multilibs to be present, and therefore starts building gcc libs multilib'ed. Unfortunately, FC's GCC has been broken into i386 and x86_64 packages (i.e. /usr/bin/gcc's expectations are inconsistent with the rpm packaging). Anyway, --disable-multlib is the appropriate work-around. > However, the clues I found in the ghdl package (probably just > --disable-multilib) were enough to get things building. My thanks to > Paul. I'll respin the package and update bugzilla. Could you upload the *.x86_64.rpm binary rpms? I am suspecting some paths don't get set up correctly, but I can't check, because I don't have access to x86_64's ... Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
