Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Kwiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183040 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-02 10:09 EST ------- Everything looks good except the Summary. Since all of the summaries are ending up as "blah Perl module", I guess this is a product of the specfile generator you're using. Unfortunately I'll have to carp about all of them. For this module something like "A Perl wiki implementation" should be fine. As usual, the spec is clean, source matches upstream, license is correct, package builds fine in mock (+ dependencies not yet checked in). I wonder if you need the explicit Requires: perl(Spoon) >= 0.22; extras is guaranteed to have that version (once you check it in) so RPM should find the requirement on its own. No blocker, though. Approved, subject to additional of a reasonable summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
