On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 03:40 -0500, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > -%check || : > -make test > +%check > +make test || : [...] > %changelog > +* Wed Feb 22 2006 Aurelien Bompard <gauret[AT]free.fr> 0.12-7 > +- disable unit tests (map8.t fails on x86_64) Um, no. You didn't disable the unit test, but just ignored its result. And it's not "just" a unit test failure but a plain crash in t/map8.t's test 2 ($no->recode8(...)), so this package is now pretty certainly shipped broken for x86_64. If it can't be fixed, please ExcludeArch x86_64 instead (and also in all dependent packages), file the appropriate Bugzilla ticket and refer to it in the specfile(s). FYI, the compilation warnings building it on x86_64 are: map8x.c: In function 'map8_recode8': map8x.c:322: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness map8x.c:315: warning: unused variable 'uc' [...] Map8.xs: In function 'to8_cb': Map8.xs:84: warning: pointer targets in return differ in signedness Map8.xs: In function 'XS_Unicode__Map8__empty_block': Map8.xs:201: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type Map8.c: In function 'XS_Unicode__Map8_to16': Map8.c:490: warning: pointer targets in initialization differ in signedness Map8.xs: In function 'XS_Unicode__Map8_recode8': Map8.xs:359: warning: implicit declaration of function 'map8_recode8' Map8.c: At top level: /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/patchlevel.h:122: warning: 'local_patches' defined but not used "implicit declaration of function 'map8_recode8'" looks susceptible. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
