Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028 ------- Additional Comments From steve@xxxxxxxxx 2006-02-25 19:57 EST ------- > What autogenerated these specs? cpanspec (http://cpanspec.sf.net/ or install it from Extras). While I didn't (and probably should) mention it in the changelog, I had to do a little minor cleanup to most of the specs it generated, but it's usually just a matter of verifying the license and fixing the description. > I'll try to get through them all tonight. Thank you. :-) > Anyway, one problem and one question: > > BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.6.1 should go; it will always be satisfied for > Extras packages thus is prohibited by the packaging guidelines. True. That's probably something picked up by cpanspec. I'll change that. > Why the Provides: perl(mixin)? I note that RPM does not find that provide, > but I'm wondering why not. ISTR that rpm picked up a Requires, but not the Provides, so I added the Provides. The Requires seems to get picked up in this whole stack, so I don't think filtering it out would work. # rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(mixin)' perl-IO-All-0.33-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-0.38-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences-0.13-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-Search-0.12-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-Revisions-0.15-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges-0.13-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-NewPage-0.12-1.fc4 perl-Kwiki-UserName-0.14-1.fc4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list