Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-06 14:54 EST ------- * I uppdated the spec/srpm and made changes according to the comments above * The only thing I did not change is the install location: upstream ruby does not provide a real distinction between vendor and site install locations. Python, which is in a similar situation, uses site-packages for both rpm and local installs. We are trying (as part of the Ruby SIG) to get this rectified, but in the meantime I would like to stick with site_ruby Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/facter.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/facter-1.1.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
