Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182173 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-21 12:33 EST ------- Further Bads: - BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install ? Encoding should be UTF-8 - Test of /sbin/ldconfig in %post and %pustun is unnecessary. - Static libs in devel package. - Missing text of the license in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
