Patrice Dumas wrote:
- '''MUST''': For each binary and noarch RPM generated, reviewers
must verify that the list of provides ("rpm -q --provides ...")
are acceptable for this package.
That would have avoided the issue, I believe. And it is good practice, so
let's enforce it. It raises the cost of doing a review, but I believe it
is worth it.
I'm not so sure, the longer the MUST list, the less thorough each step
will be done. We need to strike a balance here. This would make a fine
should though.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
