On 2/22/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think there's a need for such a special case. Packages simply > must not provide things they don't really intend to "export". well yes... they shouldn't do that... but I'm asking how do we do a better job of checking for that...especially when rpmbuild's automagical provides calculator notices something and makes it a provides when you did not explicitly ask it to be? If building binary packages and checking its provides list isn't a hard review requirement for pre-submission reviews... how else can we do a better job of catching this sort of thing? And how do we do a better job of making sure that if it happens it doesn't bite us in the buildsystem itself? -jef -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
