[Bug 182737] Review Request: kdetoys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdetoys


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182737





------- Additional Comments From rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-03-05 18:18 EST -------
> * BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required by the %find_lang macro)

Really?  Didn't know that, thanks.

> * The package should contain the text of the license

Duh, can't believe I missed that.

> * The package contains libtool archive files (*.la)

These are for loadable modules, not shared libraries.  Regardless, in this case,
they're needed.

> * Desktop files: some don't contain the "Application" category, 
> and the "vendor" should be fedora. (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop)

Category: OK.  vendor, I recently raised that issue on the packagers mailing
list and the consensus was to only use fedora as vendor in the absense of an
existing/proper one (in this case, the proper vendor is kde).

> * maybe "%{!?debug_package:-strip}" can be dropped

Yeah, probably.  That's just to help folks who don't have redhat-rpm-config
installed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux