>>>>> "JS" == Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> writes: JS> Would reviewing the provides from a mock build a hard requirement JS> for pre-submission status have helped prevent this? It's certainly not a terrible idea, but then we're back at the problem of requiring submitters or reviewers to have enough infrastructure to run mock or providing a way to leverage the build system before the package has been checked in. In the absence of build system support, I'll happily do a mock build (on i386 or x86_64) for anyone that asks, especially if it will help prevent this kind of problem. - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list