> Sounds to me like a previous version of the package in the repo had > "Epoch: 1" in it, and the current one doesn't (effectively implying > "Epoch: 0") and hence being "older" than the previous version as far as > RPM and yum are concerned. > > Paul.. so what should I do or what should you do? -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list