Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-26 13:21 EST ------- I will add that it looks to me as if the base Fedora Perl package does the same thing. And it makes sense: a package does "use mixin 'something'", so it needs the package that supplies perl(mixin), which happens to be Spiffy. Only RPM's automatic dependency generation doesn't understand that Spiffy provides perl(mixin), so we have to instruct it. I suppose the dependency generator doesn't understand because the Spiffy module doesn't have a file named "mixin.pm", nor does it have a "package mixin" statement. It's pretty esoteric code that looks like it inserts things into the symbol table. So I think it's perfectly reasonable to have this package provide perl(mixin), because in reality it does provide perl(mixin). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
