Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am Samstag, den 18.02.2006, 14:26 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am Samstag, den 18.02.2006, 13:43 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>>
As I already wrote in the part of my mail you didn't quote I delayed my
rebuilds because of the extra rebuild, once this was done I started it.
Appereantly the discussion is when the extra rebuild was complete, in my
view this was done when the last rawhide changelog mail was send. +
maybe some time for the buildsys to pick up the changes I don't know
how/when the buildsys syncs to rawhide.
That's okay. And I wrote earlier in this thread:
Okay. We can revisit that point in time and can set i back some hours --
but where exactly? And wherever we put it, there will probably always be
someone who'll say "My package was rebuild just <insert something
between 1 and 1440> minutes earlier then <new point of time>, why does
it need a rebuild?" This could soon lead to and endless discussion that
might take a lot of more time then it takes to just rebuild the packages
in question...
But Hans, Zoltan, if you come up with a new point of time that is
acceptable for everyone I'm willing to change the script to that one.
Hans, so simply *give me a time* and this discussion can end. Just make
sure that the packages after that time were probably be build after the
buildsys picked up the latest rawhide changes.
Thats the problem, I don't know how long it takes for the buildsys to
pick up rawhide changes, so I'm suggesting to use the time of the
rawhide changelog mail + some extra time , hoping that someone who knows
the buildsys can tell us what amount of extra time is needed after the
rawhide changelog mail.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
