On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 21:38 -0500, Ed Hill wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is there is a middle ground in this static libs discussion? > > For instance, are there technical solutions such as: > > - all static libs should or perhaps must be in a -static > sub-package > - no -static sub-packages are allowed as BuildRequires for > other FC or FE packages Wouldn't this be a problem for building lib-A-static, which depends on lib-B-static? Without a BR of lib-B-static, lib-A-static would be dynamically linked to lib-B, rather defeating the purpose of having lib-A-static? Or am I horribly confused? Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
