On 2/16/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quite frankly, that's something I'd expect from the package maintainer. > Or alternatively, an indication that someone else can go ahead if he's > too busy to take care of it. This issue highlights one of the weaker points of how contributors in Extras are expected to behave when interacting with packages owned by other maintainers. We have a culture of being very cautious when touching other people's packages to do fixes and deferring to the owner's peragotive on how to handle things to prevent unwanted changes from the package owner's pov. Is this causing a bottleneck in getting packages in shape for fe5? -jef -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
