On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 19:52 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 07:02 -0800, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > What's stopping people from applying the one-liner patch repoquery in the > > yum-utils FE package if it's considered that important? > > Quite frankly, that's something I'd expect from the package maintainer. > Or alternatively, an indication that someone else can go ahead if he's > too busy to take care of it. Yum-utils in FE seems to be a bit of an orphan... Quite a bit of stuff happens upstream but getting a new release out has been hanging between to-fork-or-not-to-fork from 2.4.x for months now (feel free to blame me for that) Really, if people think having working yumdownloader + repoquery in rawhide *right now* is important, somebody just apply the patches from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175335 to yum-utils in FE, and do that two months ago if you ask me :) A new yum-utils release will come sooner or later but right now I'm having a handful with my current project(s) with little time for anything else. - Panu - -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
