On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 09:58 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:20:18 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > You forget that we have some packagers that live in parts of the world > > where internet bandwidth is costly. I suspect that each rebuild for > > devel with mock will download 300 - 750 MByte. To much for those > > packagers afaics. > > In this light it is obviously better to upgrade each and every package > to make everyone download everything again, right? > > Personally I do not mind rebuilding or downloading, but the bandwidth > argument does not really fly here. > The majority of the download (for a mock rebuild) will be from within Core which we don't have any control over (and, it seems, is the reason for the rebuild anyway.) Only a few (if any) inter-dependencies within Extras for any given package. So, if the Extras packages are going to be rebuilt (to use the new Core features), then I think there is a tremendous bandwidth savings to be had in this sort of rebuild vs each packager using mock. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
