On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 19:55 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:22:42 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Do all packages need a rebuild? > > > > Yes. > > No. > > > Most noarch packages probably would work fine without a rebuild and > > won't have a benefit from the new gcc security features. But we know > > that some noarch package are broken due to changes in rawhide -- we'd > > like to catch and fix those. And we want to make sure that a package > > still has a active maintainer while at it. > > It's still short-sighted, since This whole undertaking is short-sighted. Anything but a dep-ordered built will result into similar disorder as we have now. Also, FESCO, why aren't you able to launch such are mass rebuild yourself in at least "manually, semi-sorted" order like RH seems to be doing it? This at least would avoid the uncoordinated confusion we will be facing now. IMO, this step of yours is irresponsible. Embarrassed, Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
