Am Montag, den 27.02.2006, 16:09 -0800 schrieb Michael Thomas: > Wart wrote: > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:22 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > >>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>>>Okay, let's look at the whole situation from a different perspective. > >>>>The following list shows maintainers that still have to rebuild more > >>>>than 5 packages: > >>>>5 nos_AT_utelsystems.com > >>>Nils has not signed up since the transition from fedora.us to Fedora > >>>Extras. > >>Okay, so they are practically orphaned for at least a year? Wow. > >>So let's orphan them for real. Anyone interested in on of the following > >>packages? > >>dillo, gktools, gtkterm, neverball, whowatch > > I can pick up neverball if there are no objections. > > No objections? None? Whee! :) > > I emailed Nils to see if he was still interested in maintaining these, > but I haven't gotten a reply yet. > > So is this the right time to add these to OrphanedPackages on the wiki Yes, go ahead. > so that others can make claim to them, and claim neverball myself by > updating owners.list? Well, according to the docs in the wiki we normally wait 10 days. But we're running out of time for FE5. Wait another days or two and if no one steps up go ahead. That okay for everybody? CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
