Re: static libs ... again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quentin Spencer wrote:
So, not too long ago someone asked why I still had static libs in one of my packages since they are "banned" or at least strongly discouraged, so I started removing them from my packages. All of the libraries I maintain are math libraries, so security concerns are a non-issue. After removing the static libs from fftw-devel, it took less than 24 hours to get a bug report asking for them back. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181897 for the reasoning.

It seems theirs is a rather specific and unique case. Should we change policy to accommodate corner cases like that?

Regards,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
McGill University WSG

Mal: "Can I come in?"
Inara: "No."
Mal: "See, that's why I usually don't ask."
				--Episode #6, "Our Mrs Reynolds"

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux