Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181068 link@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From link@xxxxxxxxx 2006-02-13 13:22 EST ------- The package in general looks good to me. I'd suggest either dropping the actual text of the specification entirely or simply include it as %doc. Having a separate sub-package for this seems essentially overkill. Alternately I'd package up the spec and have the DTDs tag along (as they're a normative part of the HTML 4.01 Recommendation). The .ent(ity) files might beneficially be shipped by sgml-common -- since they're common for HTML 2.0, 3.2, 4.0, and 4.01 -- and shared by the relevant packages (cf. the comment at the top of the spec file). For the %description I might use something along the lines of: [[[ Provides the three HTML 4.01 DTDs (strict, frameset, and transitional). The DTDs are required for processing HTML 4.01 document instances using SGML tools such as OpenSP, OpenJade, or SGMLSpm. ]]] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
