On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:30 -0400, Dan wrote: > Livna used to have the uname-r-in-package-name scenario, which worked > well because a kernel module for 2 different kernels was seen by yum as > two different packages, and this is desired functionality. They changed > now so that the package name is simply "kmod-ntfs" or similar, and thus > yum is now updating it when you get one for a new kernel, leaving the > old kernel without a module :(. I agree, if yum and smart were improved > to handle the two-dimensional versioning, that would make everything > much simpler. yum should be doing the right thing here as long as the kernel module package Provides: kernel-modules like it's supposed to... Jeremy -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
