On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 13:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > In the meantime, the Packaging Guidelines should be updated to clarify > when use of fedora-usermngt is warranted. I realize there's some > controversy involved, so should FESCO get involved to officially > bless/veto the use of fedora-usermngt? Yes please. It seems absolutely insane to me to not have a set policy on something as important as this. Either we use fedora-usermgmt in all packages, or not at all. (Personally my vote's for merging the fedora-usermgmt functionality into adduser itself, as Jef recommended IIRC.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
