On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 23:05 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 14:12 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > yum should be doing the right thing here as long as the kernel module
> > package Provides: kernel-modules like it's supposed to...
>
> Okay, so we've had a miscommunication or a missed detail in the module
> packaging standard/kmodtool reviews.
/me goes to double check the yum source
> kmodtool emits "kernel-module = ${verrel}${variant}" at the moment (note
> kernel-module, not kernel-modules). So if the plural form is "correct",
> kmodtool needs fixups. Please confirm that it is the intention and I'll
> look into fixing stuff.
Yeah, it should have been the plural form. Apologies, I probably should
have noticed this sooner
Jeremy
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
