Michael J. Knox wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> Michael J Knox wrote: >>> Wart wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Hans de Goede wrote: >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Hans >>>>> >>>>> p.s. >>>>> >>>>> I'm also thinking about unorphaning monkey-bubble, but first I'm >>>>> trying >>>>> to get it to build (and run) with gstreamer-0.10 the version in CVS >>>>> want >>>>> gstreamer-0.6 upstream has a newerversion which works with >>>>> gstreamer-0.8 >>>>> but since upstream seems dead I would rather have it build against >>>>> 0.10 . >>>> Michael Knox asked to take over monkey-bubble a month ago, but needed a >>>> sponsor at the time before he could do so. You might want to >>>> coordinate >>>> with him. >>>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-March/msg00301.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Yup and there is an updated srpm in bugzilla from me for it. I just >>> haven't updated the owners list yet. >>> >> >> Ah luckily you didn't put too much work in it, so my work is not in >> vain. For example you didn't fix the icon being put in the wrong place, >> nor did you fix the scripts to properly handle the gconf schemas as >> described in the wiki. Also you fixed the compile by removing the >> -Werror, whereas I have just finished a patch which fixes it by fixing >> the warnings. Also your srpm seems based on gstreamer-0.8 where we now >> have gstreamer-0.10. I've another patch which massages monkey-bubble >> into using gstreamer-0.10 because I don't want to unorphan something >> while it is using a compat-lib. >> >> Michael, besides not updating owners.list you also didn't import it into >> CVS, otherwise I would have based my work on your version. Anyways I'm >> almost done bringing this fully up to spec (pun intended), after I'm >> done with that I'll import my version into CVS (since that one is IMHO >> clearly better). After this the remainging question is, who's name are >> we going to put in owners.list? Do you want to maintain it including my >> move to gstreamer-0.10 massaging, or shall I? >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> > > I have been busy working with the developers (of monkey-bubble) fixing > bugs, check the gnome cvs log to see. > > I have begun work on porting it too gstreamer-0.10, but due to > University getting in the way of my hacking, I have not progressed far. > > gstreamer-0.8 is still in FE as it is needed for other applications, > gnomebaker comes to mind, so I do not think its a shop stopper that it > is still using 0.8. > > The fixed srpm I have on my HDD at home is made witha snap shot from the > cvs tree, as many fixes have been made to monkey-bubble. The srpm in > bugzilla was a naive fix up. > > Also, it was not imported into cvs as I only got sponsored about 2 weeks > ago and at the time of making that srpm, I was not sponsored. > > I would prefer to continue with monkey-bubble, but if you feel > different, then we can discuss this off list. > If you want todo monkey-bubble and even have contact with upstream thats great! Plenty of other stuff for me to package / spend time on. It was just that I've been spending some hours on monkey-bubble today and after seeing the spec linked to from bugzilla I thought it would be a good idea to update CVS to my version instead of yours, as I already tried to say you would have been free to pick up from there. I understand now that you have a much newer SRPM hidden somewhere :) So I'm fine with you unorphaning and maintaining monkey-bubble, but I don't want my work to be lost. I'll send you a private mail with my specfile for 0.3.2 and the 2 patches I have. The gstreamer patch very probably will only apply against 0.3.2, after that you can in essence copy src/audio/sound-manager.c to your current monkey-bubble tree as that file is for 60-70% new after the patch. About the specfile, please take a look at the installation of the icon and all the %post and %pre scripts these contain correct handling of the GConf schemas, the icon and scrollkeeper! I've just finished my second iteration of the gstreamer-0.10 patch and it works (yeah!). Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
